For
those of us that spend much of our free time watching television, rather than
spending spare time doing more productive activities, it seems like there is a
pill or drug for every possible condition we may posses. It seems like the
commercials that advertise these products have been increasing over the past
decade. It was the memories of these commercials that made me want to write my
blog post on erectile dysfunction, but due to it not being really a mental
issue I had to abandon the plan and turn to another well publicized conditions.
This would be the condition of attention deficit disorder (ADD) and attention
deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This blog is not discrediting that some
do suffer form ADD/ADHD, but rather takes an approach that it is over-diagnosed
and over-medicated. Growing up as a child of the 1990’s ADD/ADHD was not a
stranger to the classroom. It become largely diagnosed in the mid 1990s and
continues to today, when kids are often off task or not wanting to sit still
and partake in lessons. Back then, these kids were known as “hyper”, but now
they are seen as “sick”, and in this culture of pharmaceuticals there is a pill
that can make them all better.
 |
Taken From http://whosright.com/poll/could-adhd-be-genetic |
The
DSM-IV criteria for ADHD states that “symptoms of inattention and/or
hyperactivity-impulsivity have been present for at least six months to a point
that is disruptive and inappropriate for the development level”. It includes
that they may have trouble staying focused on tasks, dislikes things that take
lots of mental effort, is forgetful, is disorganized, fidgets in seat, and may
blurt out answers. Personally, I do not see these as characteristics that are
outside of typical childhood behavior. Also, the “development level” that these
children are being measured to is nothing more than a social construction of
how the children of a particular age should act. It is even seen in a class
reading that the younger students in a grade are 60 percent more likely to bediagnosed with ADD/ADHD than the oldest students in a grade. It also addresses
that due to these guidelines the younger children may be being over-diagnosed.
The common treatment for ADD/ADHD is to prescribe these “sick” children with a
psychostimulate drug, such as Ritalin or Adderall. It functions by blocking the
transmission of dopamine and noradrenaline in the brain, very similar to the
effects of methamphetamine and cocaine. These drugs have also contributed to a
wide spread abuse of proscription drugs. These kinds of drugs can actually
alter the brain, and how it develops. This is especially true for children, who
still have developing brains.
 |
Taken From http://www.soberlanding.com/category/prescription-drug-addiction |
The use
of media to advertise these pharmaceutical drugs can also cause parents and
other adults, such as teacher, coaches, etc., to self diagnose children as
having ADD/ADHD, even though they lack the proper training. The doctors they
subsequently take them to may even stand to profit from the pharmaceutical
companies for prescribing their product. Other countries, such as Canada, have
taken approaches to limit prescription drug advertising on television;
much the
same way that tobacco companies are not allowed to advertise in the US. Even celebrities such as Adam
Levine are used in a ADHD advertisements made by Shire Pharmaceuticals. The parents believe that these cure all drugs will fix their “sick”
children. If these drugs are not completely working luckily there is a new drug
to take in addition to the stimulant drug they are likely already prescribed.
“Your child’s stimulant medicine may be helping, but some ADHD symptoms can
still get in the way,” is stated on the website for Intuniv. Now children can
take several pills to cure their “illness”. With advertisements like this it is
hard to not think the pharmaceutical companies are wanting to make a profit off
a new segment of the market and are taking us for a ride. This argument is even
the focus of Common Radius Films’ Generation Rx. Can one really blame a child
for not wanting to be stuck in a classroom to learn for six hours a day,
especially with an increased focus on standardized testing? It’s also the
children that don’t fit into the socially constructed ideals of what a student
should be that are targeted. It is all about conforming and fitting into the
mold.
 |
Taken From http://www.health.com/health/gallery/0,,20441463,00.html |
The
children that don’t fit in this mold are often thought of as having something
wrong with them and a fix is searched for, and for some the result if
medication. It is these children that live outside the box that make the great
changes in society. These include great thinkers like Da Vince, Einstein, and
Aristotle. The use of these medications could be killing off the next
generation of great thinkers by quite literally rewiring their brains. One
subject that cannot be ignored is that some children do require additional help
and supervision, but with much of the society having both parents working (if
even still together) they may not be able to provide the additional time for
their children, and turn to medication for help. One must be sure to not think
that ADD/ADHD is not only in children, but is also diagnosed to many adults and
they also get medication to “cure” them.
 |
Taken From http://ritalinsideeffects.net/ |
There is
a reoccurring theme of what is considered deviant is a social construction. It
has been stated in the blog posts before this one as well as here. Not fitting
into the ideas and molds for how one should act is how someone becomes deviant.
Unfortunately there are many ways for school children to not fit in and become
deviant. Acting a specific way could get one diagnosed and not only labeled as
deviant but also as “sick”. Through advertisements about this “sickness” people
become worried about their children and more and more take them to a doctor to
get diagnosed and prescribed a drug to “fix” them, and the doctors also might
get a kick back from the pharmaceutical companies in one form or another. The
effects of these drugs then can actually alter the development of a child’s
brain and turn them into a different person than if they had never taken these
drugs. Again, this post is not to say that some people legitimately have
ADD/ADHD and need help, but that it is over publicized and over diagnosed so
that drug companies can make a profit off of parents’ fear that their might be something
wrong with their children, and that drugs are the only way to make them better.
Word Count: 1091
Matt,
ReplyDeleteAgree/Awesome
Nice job getting at the heart of the issue surrounding the ever expanding diagnosis of ADD/ADHD. I especially liked how you highlighted the negative aspects of over-medication. One thing you could do better is cite your sources, and provide a works cited. But, overall nicely done, and if you wish to expand on the adult spectrum of ADD/ADHD, then "The Emergence of Hyperactive Adults as Abnormal" by Conrad and Potter in our text is a good resource. Overall, nicely done.
Steve
Great job. I honestly thought you touched on more information than expected. You did good in your research on the issue of the disorder. Your intro really made me want to read what you had to say about ADD and ADHD. One interesting thing mentioned in your blog was that younger students in a grade are 60% percent more likely to be diagnosed with ADD/ADHD than the older students in a grade. Another point made was about how Canada is trying to work on limiting drug advertising on TV. In relation to class, a lot of this information ties in with the film Generation Rx, and how these prescription drugs are hurting our youth. You add additional facts, which makes your blog informative and interesting to read.
ReplyDeleteRod.
Agree/Awesome
ReplyDeleteExcellent post! Your use of humor in the intro worked well as an attention grabber and your images made the post aesthetically pleasing :). I liked how you established your intention not to discredit the fact that many do suffer from ADD or ADHD, and therefore benefit from treatment, but that the issue of over-medicating and misdiagnosis is rampant. One great point you made was that the children being diagnosed with this condition are not adhering to the socially constructed behavior expectations. As Becker put it, "deviant behavior is behavior that people so label" (Calhoun, Conyers & Thio, p.39). Maturity and age do not go hand in hand, and is something that the medical community should be considering when evaluating kids and subjecting them dangerous drug therapy. You did a great job at exploring the various issues surrounding this condition.
Jaime