Sunday, February 26, 2012

Murderball Film Review



What is the main thesis of this film?

To me, the thesis of this film was that those that are quadriplegic are able to do many if not just about all of the same things that those out of a wheelchair can do, but that they might require some alternative way to accomplish a task. Pretty much it is proving that they are not useless; like it is sometimes portrayed.

Taken From http://www.dosomething.org/actnow/actionguide/host-a-screening-film-murderball
What are the main arguments in support of the thesis?

The main arguments that I found in support of this thesis was showing how physically disabled people are able to compete in the Paralympics, as well as how some of the sports are actually full contact sports such as wheelchair rugby.

How does the thesis of this film relate to the course?

Taken From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paralympic_Games
The thesis of “Murderball” is related to the course because it is fighting against the preconceived notion that comes along with being disabled. It also relates to how people are often only seeing people as able or disabled, but in wheelchair rugby there is a point system that qualifies how many certain players may be on the court at one time depending on their physical ability level.

Which arguments/point did you find the most convincing?

What I found that most convincing was how the main characters within the film have been able to find ways to accomplish pretty much all of the tasks that fully able people are able to do. They are able to drive, cook, have sex, and pull pranks. It almost makes one take what they have for granted. It even show that people with disabilities are all kinds just like everyone else; they can be nice or assholes, which is very much in support about what was being said by bitchmedia about the good cripple and the supercrip.

Which arguments/points did you find the least convincing?

What I found the least convincing was not actually in the film, but it came from the discussion in class after the film. It pretty much came up that many people in wheelchairs don’t want to walk again. I may have just taken it the wrong way, or am having a hard time believing it, but I think 99% if given the opportunity to be fully able again would take that option. I think its largely that they came to accept that they likely were never going to be fully able again and in turn have just found way to cope with it.

Research Study:

If I were to conduct a research study I would want to interview quadriplegics of all groups, classes, etc. and see if they would want to walk again given the chance without risks. I want to see if they really would not want to change their life, or have possibly accepted the lifestyle out of necessity.

F*cking n00b!!!!!!!!!!!



            Language is one of the primary parts that make up a culture, and like culture it can change and evolve over time; this is also very true in subcultures. The chosen word to focus on in this blog post was the term “noob”, also commonly spelled “n00b”. This term is likely understood by many of the younger generations that have some experience with the gaming community of the US, and has had its own development over the last fifty some years.

Taken From http://www.hark.com/collections/gggdtwhwrx-noob
            The meaning of this term has is widely understood and has been developed among the gamer subculture in Internet based computer games over the last decade. It has largely been derived from the term “newbie”, which originated in the mid twentieth century to describe a “newcomer, new person to an existing situation”. The term noob is similar to newbie in meaning, but often implies a larger degree of incompetence or stupidity. The development and change of this term over time is reflective of what Daniel Moynihan put forward as “American society has increased beyond the levels the community can “afford to recognize” and that, accordingly, we have been redefining deviancy” (Thio et al. pg. 15). A newbie is a person that would be able to advance and become well versed in whichever task they are new to. A noob is largely considered a person that is stupid/ incompetent, and unwilling to put in the time and effort to becomebetter or more proficient. It has however been difficult to be able to find a single indication for a noob’s ability to improve.

           
             The term has moved more into the mainstream through mass media. One of the most prominent examples of mainstream used of noob was from a comerical about Activision’s Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3. It featured Sam Worthington teaching the noob (Jonah Hill) how to play the game properly. From the research that was conducted on how the gaming community responds to the use of noob, those called noob will often admit to being new to the game and needing help at times, or falsely accused and respond in a very defensive manner. The more experienced people within the video game community often are just frustrated by those that they feel are not up to their level, but it can also be seen that many acknowledge “everyone is a noob at one point”.

           
            In relating the use of noob to in class reading, the most obvious theory that comes to mind would be Howard Becker’s “Labeling Theory”. A person that has been labeled as a noob may cause the person to accept that label and turn to illegitimate ways or cheats to become better at the game. This creates the self-fulfiling prophecy that Becker was hinting towards.

           This also relates to John Braithwaite’s Shaming Theory. In the gaming community a noob may encounter some negative sanctions. While in “normal” society it can take the shape of disapproving looks and gestures, or being the subject of gossip. In the gaming community people tend to take advantage of the anonymity of online gaming, where one is often only known to others as their gamer tag; they unleash verbal tirades full of poor grammar, misspellings, and profanity. What can often assist a noob is the fact that it is often not obvious if one is one at the start of a game/match, but is often identified by a mistake that is believed would not be made by a more experienced player. A noob can also lose the status of noob in a game by pulling of a game changing or impressive move/maneuver. Then the community of player in the game may praise the gamer, and through this praise returns him/her as part of the collective properly playing the game.

            Many different groups and subgroups have language and insults that are specific to their community. Noon or n00b are perfect examples of how this is true within the gaming community. It has evolved from having a different meaning when it was in the form of newbie, to what it means today. It is destined to eventually fade or transform into a different word as the gaming culture, as well as mainstream society, continues to change and evolve.


Works Cited

1.    Moynihan, D. (1993). Defining Deviancy Down. “Readings in Deviant Behavior: Sixth Edition.” (Pgs 15-17). Pearson Education Inc.
2.    Becker, H. (1963). Labeling Theory. “Readings in Deviant Behavior: Sixth Edition.” (Pgs 39-41). Pearson Education Inc.
3.    Braithwaite, J (1989). Shaming Theory. “Reading in Deviant Behavior: Sixth Edition.” (Pgs 33-35). Person Education Inc.
 


Word Count: 706

Sunday, February 12, 2012

Middle Sexes Film Review


What is the main thesis of this film?

To me the thesis of this film was that transsexual behaviors are natural and normal, and that it can be socially accepted to have more than a binary system for gender/sex.

What were the main arguments in support of the thesis?

The main arguments that I found in support of the films thesis was the statistically and scientifically sexual diversity of more than just male and female is a very common thing. It can even vary but what a specific society’s culture values in terms of sex.

How does the thesis of this film relate to the course?

The thesis of this film relates to the course by showing that sex and sexuality variance is a common thing that has become deviant due to social constructions. Many of these social constructions were communicated by Leslie Feinberg in Transgender Warriors. Also, Ashley Love wrote in her blog how transsexual people have been labeled in line with what Becker stated in his Labeling Theory, even among a community that many tend to think of as united with common views and values.

Which arguments/points did you find the most convincing?

Three things that were presented in the film that I found most convincing was that 1 in 100 are born with ambiguous genitals, genitals and brains develop at different times and can go in different directions, and that the Indian and Thai culture has a widely accepted third sex.

Which arguments/points did you find the least convincing?

Several points that I noticed in the film that I think didn't work in its favor was such a focus on Southeast Asia with many of the culture having religious principles that supported their behavior, along with the lack of women to men transsexuals.

Research Study:

What I seemed to really notice was the film focusing on transgender women, not transgender men. I would want to do research to see the types of crimes that have transgender men have been the victims of and compare the violent crime rates between the two along with other statistical date of the two groups.

Sunday, February 5, 2012

Dental Deviance



            Deviance is something that everyone encounters in his or her everyday life. It can range from criminal behaviors to something that may only receive a strange look if the activity is noticed. Deviant acts usually have formal or informal sanction that attempt to correct the deviant behavior. How people view and interpreted these actions is purely socially constructed. This can cause what is considered deviant to vary greatly between time and location. For example it is normal to see a person wearing shorts and a tank top walking around a shopping center on a July afternoon, but it becomes deviant on a January morning. Even varying from the social norms for gender can be quite deviant. Most everyone violates some social norm on a regular basis, for this I am no exception.

            Growing up my childhood was fairly in line with the norms of an American family. My parents have stayed married and we had an upper middle class house in a bit more of the rural area of Vancouver. My parents both worked as teachers and I had two older brothers. In the fall I would play club soccer with a group of friends. My brothers and I all attended the elementary school where my mother taught, and I graduated from the same school district. Those younger days it was pretty easy to get along with others, but in middle school kids start to notice and point out differences. While I personally follow a lot of the norms of society by being a white heterosexual male, there is one observable part of me that I do consider to be deviant.

What I consider to be deviant is my body size. What is almost always considered a deviant body size is being overweight. For me it is being slim for my height. I am 5’11” and according to the US National Center for Health Statistics a male my age should weigh around 171 pounds (See the table here). I personally weight around 135lbs. Some people may not see this as all that deviant but it is often one of the master statuses that I am associated with. When someone is trying to identify me to a coworker I am pretty much always identified as “the skinny one”. The largest impact of my master status is being thin is often considered not masculine because men in our society are supposed to be large and muscular. When I was younger many people would comment that I needed to eat more because I was so thin, when I just naturally have a fast metabolism.

Taken From http://savvyhealth.blogspot.com/2011/02/normal-0-false-false-false-en-us-x-none_24.html
This is a good example of Howard Becker’s Labeling Theory. In short Becker’s theory states that people are labeled according to social norms and are treated as a reflection of the label they are given. For example, if a person was to be labeled a thief and at party something goes missing, most people will automatically expect the “thief” to be the one responsible for taking the item, and even if it is discovered that they were not the one responsible, most of the others will not feel all that bad for suspecting the person that had been labeled. I am often considered physically less able than many of my peers by being labeled as “skinny”.

While I did focus much of the first part of this post on why I am considered deviant in one way, the fact is that I am really not that deviant except for my body size. Like previously stated I am a white heterosexual male, which had an upper middle class upbringing and finished high school. I also largely support myself with my own income and have a white girlfriend and a dog. Overall I am fairly in line with the social norms of the US. According to Travis Hirschi’s Control Theory, this may be due to the fact that I have been attached to many of these social norms and non-deviant behavior throughout my upbringing.

For class we were told to write about violating these aforementioned social norms. We had to either continually act or dress in a deviant fashion, or commit a deviant act three times. For this assignment I chose to preform a task that hopefully most people preform on a daily basis, but in a fairly private setting. This task is brushing your teeth. I saw this as not extremely deviant act, but one that would seem a bit out of place and lead to some reactions from people.

Taken From http://titusdentistry.com/2011/04/toothbrush-101/
I preformed my public tooth brushing on the WSU Vancouver campus on February 3, 2012. I spread the three times throughout my day on campus with the first brushing occurred around 10:30 am, with the second around 2:40 and third around 4:10 pm. I would start at one of the drinking fountains in a hallway and brush while I walked across the quad to another building.


What I noticed was actually quite a lack of a reaction from any of the observers. The only reaction that I noticed was that people would look up for a quick second to register what I was doing, and then they would quickly look away and avoid looking at me again. This avoiding eye contact is somewhat in line with John Baithwaite’s Shaming Theory in that people will preform some action of disapproval upon the person committing the deviant act to show that action is not acceptable. I was actually surprised that no one even asked me what I was doing, but I did feel that I shouldn’t have been brushing my teeth the way I was. This goes to show that I thought what I was doing was wrong and I was fighting the path of least resistance to follow social norms by preforming a task that is not commonly done in public.

In the end I can say that I am all that much of a deviant individual. The only way that I really consider myself to be a socially deviant individual is for my body size. Through having to act deviant for class and the how I felt about the act really supports that what Becker was saying in his work, “Outsiders-Defining Deviance” that rules we live by represent informal agreements, such as tooth brushing should take place in a private setting of ones bathroom or at most the semi private setting of a public restroom. Deviance is something that everyone encounters more or less everyday, and most people are also deviant in some way at least part of the time.

Works Cited

1.             Becker, H. (1963). Outsiders, Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. (Pgs 1-18). The Free Press.
2.             Hirschi, T. (1969). Control Theory. “Readings in Deviant Behavior: Sixth Edition.” (Pgs 30-32). Pearson Education Inc.
3.             Braithwaite, J. (1989). Shaming Theory. “Reading in Deviant Behavior: Sixth Edition.” (Pgs 33-35). Person Education Inc.

 

Word Count: 1086